Sharkwater & the New Conservationists

Filed under: Science — one November 2, 2007 @ 6:49 pm

We've inadvertently slipped into a conservation theme this week. I just finished watching the Making of Sharkwater, the first film attempt by Canadian Rob Stewart. From an old-school environmentalist at the helm motoring their ship away from the machine-gun toting Costa Rican Coast Guard and an all-star musical score and soundtrack, this film looks to be a must-see.

The ecological impact of shark hunting could potentially be huge since they are one of the ocean's top predators and have been since before dinosaurs even existed. But what makes shark hunting different than any other type of fishing?  Shark Fin Soup.

In some parts of the world Shark Fin Soup is considered a delicacy and a sign of wealth. The fin adds almost nothing to the dish besides texture and it is not feeding starving children or even everyday working-folks. It's a status symbol to serve at weddings and big social events.

And that's not the whole tragedy. The worst part is this: the fin is the only part of the shark that is used. They literally capture sharks by the hundreds, cut the dorsal fins off and dump the bodies. There is really no excuse, no up-side to consider. It's a vulgar abuse of nature and there's not much more to it than that.

Unfortunately, in international waters there aren't many laws and there are even fewer people willing to go to bat for sharks, who are still viewed by many as man-eaters at-worst and pests at-best. Luckily there are some real dedicated folks, some of them willing to go to perhaps-insane extremes (like Paul Watson) in order to fight the "good fight" and some of them were involved with this film

Keep an eye out for this film, it's supposed to be in theaters soon.

- one 

Share and Enjoy


Can You Hear The Dolphins Cry?

Filed under: Science — one November 1, 2007 @ 1:04 pm

When I saw a video on the "secret" annual Japanese dolphin slaughter I'll admit, I felt a little twinge but I was all set to skip the story until I saw it involved Hayden Panettiere (of Heroes).  I'd never really pegged her as a Paris/Britney Bimbo type but I certainly didn't credit her with being a hardcore environmental activist either.

Shocking as it was to discover this teenage actress was in Japan to protest the killing of dolphins, when I watched the video I was completely astounded to see her in the water attempting to reach (and free) a pod of trapped dolphins with a group of others at risk of their own lives (the Japanese fishermen kept interjecting their boat — along with it's outboard propeller — between the swimmers and the dolphins).

To be perfectly clear, for those that have no idea what this dolphin slaughter business is all about, it's this in a nutshell: Japanese eat fish, Dolphins eat fish, so once a year in a couple of fishing villages on the Japanese coast the fishermen literally gut their competition by netting, herding, and slaughtering dolphins. The idea is that fewer dolphins = more fish, and the logic is sound.

What's more, this really isn't that out-of-the-ordinary. We (humans) have been killing competitive predators for eons. Farmers to this day will kill wolves and wild dogs they see nearby in order to protect their sheep, goats and chickens. The only thing that makes this situation unique is that the predator is cute, possibly cuddly, and certainly intelligent.

So I'm torn. On the one hand my heart goes out to the dolphins, but on the other hand the fishermen are just doing essentially the same thing as farmers worldwide have done and will continue to do. There is no easy answer here, so as tempting as it is to side wholeheartedly with the environmentalists (after all, they're the ones who aren't killing anyone/anything) it's also important to recognize that fish is an important part of the Japanese (and worldwide) diet and smaller catches (due to dolphins running wild and stuffing themselves) could lead to human deaths from vitamin deficiencies or starvation — not that it justifies killing dolphins, but it's just not a simple situation to resolve.

The Japan Sea is certainly over-fished and the islands are crowded.  Perhaps the real answer lies in human population control, or maybe even a more humane method of dolphin population control. Whatever the case, I felt it was important to recognize responsible idealism and bravery because there isn't enough of it in the world. Thank you Hayden, for setting a great example. Most people don't like to think of themselves as a "role model" but too bad, you've proven yourself to be a great one so far.

In closing, here is a YouTube video set to the song by LIVE that gives this post its title and here is another that is a bit more painful to watch.

- one

Share and Enjoy


Just How Nutty is Scott Adams?

Filed under: Humor,Politics,Science — one September 25, 2007 @ 4:58 pm
Scott Adams is the creator of the popular comic strip, Dilbert. Personally, I'm a big fan. Dilbert is funny in all the right ways and does a terrific job satirizing what life as a mid-level employee is like in a dog-eat-dog corporate world. Reading the strip one might get the impression its creator is a brilliant, eccentric and cynical man. Most of that is apparently true, although which characteristics are dominant seems to be up in the air.
Those who have seen interviews with Adams or read his blog are probably aware of his propensity for discussing evolution in a combative manner. He often qualifies himself by stating that he's not saying evolution isn't a well-proven fact, but then proceeds to attack it anyway.
Well, just a few days ago he seemed to go off the deep end in another department. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was scheduled to be in New York to speak at the UN and also to debate at Columbia University. Ahmadinejad also requested to lat a wreath at the site of the World Trade Center but was told this wasn't possible due to security concerns.
The Iranian President's visit to New York, as well as all three proposed stops, have caused some outrage among Americans and this in turn apparently sparked outrage in Adams, who railed sarcastically against those who would deny the Iranian President the same freedom of speech they enjoy.
I'm all-for allowing Ahmadinejad to speak freely, but Adams didn't stop there.  He suggested that the Iranian President's comment that "Israel should be wiped off the face of the map" was mistranslated and really just means he wants Israel's government to change some of their policies. Although he is correct that the exact translation can't really be nailed down in English, no one seems to share Mr. Adams' drastically different interpretation of what Mr. Ahmadinejad said.
But Adams didn't stop there. He continued on about one of the Iranian President's other famous comments: That the holocaust is a myth. Adams seems to think that Ahmadinejad meant "Myth" like a parable by which we can learn a valuable life-lesson.  It is unclear why Scott would think this since Ahmadinejad has been quite clear in his beliefs and even hosted a International Holocaust Denier's Seminar last year.
Not content to leave a badly misinformed opinion alone, Adams added a number of further comments which make his opinion of Israel seem to be, well… a bit negative — and that's perfectly fine but coupled with his (woefully false) character un-assassination piece on the Iranian President and his sketchy views on evolution I have to wonder if the guy who has been sitting in the cartoon cubicle next to me all these years is a religious nutbag and I just never noticed.
In the end, Mr. Ahmadinejad did speak at Columbia and he was publicly criticized by University President Lee Bollinger. The Iranian President was hard-pressed to hide his true colors as he hinted at popular (among stupid people) 9/11 conspiracy theories and when asked directly how he could deny the holocaust when it is so well documented he avoided the question entirely and only said that whether or not it happened has nothing to do with the plight of Palestinians.
It's reassuring to know that we, as Americans, weren't seeing only some distorted version of Ahmadinejad handed to us by the media and the government, but disturbing that some otherwise educated public figures refuse to believe the facts and would rather distribute false information to their fans and the world community at-large.
- One 

Share and Enjoy


<<< Previous Page - Next Page >>>